Master Builder Uncovers Striking Similarities In Indian and Incan / Mayan Sacred Structures - Architecture
Reprinted Courtesy of Hinduism Today, June 1995
Ancient Architects Employed Analogous Design Doctrines and Masonry Methods
"Sri V. Ganapati Sthapati," read Deva Rajan's fax to our Hawaii
editorial office from Machu Picchu high in the rugged Andes Mountains
of Peru, South America, "has just measured with tape, compass and a
lay-out story pole, two ancient Incan structures at Machu Picchu: a
temple and a residence. He has confirmed that the layout of these
structures, locations for doors, windows, proportions of width to length,
roof styles, degree of slopes for roofs, column sizes, wall thicknesses,
etc., all conform completely to the principles and guidelines as
prescribed in the Shaastra Vaastu of India. Residential layouts are
identical to those found in Mohenjodaro. The temple layouts are
identical to those that he is building today and that can be found all over
India."
These startling discoveries came during a March, 1995, visit of the
master builder to the ancient Incan and Mayan sites of South and
Central America. Ganapati Sthapati is India's foremost traditional temple
architect and perhaps the first true expert in sculpture and stone
construction to personally examine these ancient buildings. To do so has
been his dream since the 1960's.
Sthapati is the architect of the San Marga Iraivan Temple [see page 28]
being built at Kauai Aadheenam, Hawaii, home of Hinduism Today. To
fulfill this life-long ambition to visit the Mayan and Incan sites, our
publisher, Satguru Sivaya Subramuniyaswami, arranged for California
builders and architects Deva Rajan and Thamby Kumaran to
accompany Sthapati on a three-week trip through South and Central
America. "Like boys on holiday," they described their exciting trek of
discovery which began 11,000 feet high in central Peru at the famed
Incan site of Machu Picchu which remained hidden until 1911.
It is Sthapati's theory that Mayan, the creator of Indian architecture,
originated from the Mayan people of Central America. In Indian history,
Mayan appears several times, most significantly as the author of
Mayamatam, "Concept of Mayan" which is a Vastu Shastra, a text on
art, architecture and town planning. The traditional date for this work is
8,000bce. Mayan appears in the Ramayana (2000bce) and again in the
Mahabharata (1400bce)-in the latter he designs a magnificent palace for
the Pandava brothers. Mayan is also mentioned in Silappathikaram, an
ancient Tamil scripture, and is author of Surya Siddhanta, one of the
most ancient Hindu treatises on astronomy.
The fundamental principle of Mayan's architecture and town planning is
the "module." Buildings and towns are to be laid out according to certain
multiples of a standard unit. Floor plans, door locations and sizes, wall
heights and roofs, all are determined by the modular plan. More
specifically, Mayan advocated the use of an eight-by-eight square, for a
total of 64 units, which is known as the Vastu Purusha Mandala. The
on-site inspection by Sthapati was to determine if the Incan and Mayan
structures did follow a modular plan and reflect the Vastu Purusha
Mandala. He also intended to examine the stone working technology-his
particular field of expertise.
Sthapati was born in 1927 into a family whose ancestors, members of
the aboriginal tribe of Viswakarmas, built the great temple at Tanjore in
the 10th century ce at the request of Raja Raja Chola. He learned the
craft from his father, Sri M. Vaiydyanatha Sthapati and his uncle, Sri M.
Sellakkannu Sthapati. He spent 27 years as head of the Government
College of Architecture and Sculpture in Mahabalipuram, Tamil Nadu,
and is responsible for India's significant resurgence in the ancient art of
stone carving. After his retirement in 1988, he continued building
temples and founded the Vastu Vedic Research Foundation to explore
the ancient origins of the temple craftsmen. He is responsible for the
construction of dozens of temples in India, plus others in Chicago,
Washington D.C., Kentucky, Boston, Baltimore, San Francisco, and
Hawaii in the USA as well as in the UK, Singapore, Fiji, Malaysia,
Mauritius and the Seychelles.
Machu Picchu
The moment Sthapati approached an ancient Incan residential building at
Machu Picchu on March 15th, he pointed at the wall and said, "That is a
thickness of one kishku hasta"-33 inches, a standard measure in South
India first promulgated by Mayan. He proceeded to measure the
buildings in detail and discovered each was indeed built on a
module-based plan [see photos and drawings to right], following the
system of Mayan's eight-by-eight squares. The module method was
followed within small fractions of an inch, according to Thamby
Kumaran, who was taking the measurements. The buildings were
oriented toward certain points of the compass, also a principle of
Mayan, rather than randomly placed. Also the lengths of buildings were
never more than twice their width, as Mayan stipulated.
From Machu Picchu the three adventurers traveled to Saqsayhuman, an
Incan site dated from 400 bce to 1400 ce. Here are the famous stone
walls made of rocks weighing up to 160 tons and fitted together so
expertly that a knife blade cannot be put in any joint. "Nobody knows
how these stones were put in place," offered their guide when they first
arrived on the site. Sthapati politely differed, and pointed out the insets
chiseled into the base of many stones, as well as small knobs left on their
faces. "These are for the use of levers, the exact same system we
continue to use in India to move large stones. Thirty to forty men can
move these very large rocks with this method," he explained to the
guide's astonishment.
He could see other details of the stone working were identical to what is
practiced in India, such as the method of quarrying stones by splitting off
slabs [photo page 14]. So too was the jointing and fitting of stones, the
use of lime mortar, leveling with a plumb line and triangle, and the
corbeling for the roofs. Corbeling is the method by which stones are
drawn in layer by layer until they meet or nearly meet to allow a roof
slab to be placed on top. Sthapati considers the similarity of this
technology to that used in India to be very significant. The use of the
horizontal lintel and the absence of the arch are additional noteworthy
points of correspondence between the two traditions.
Land of the Mayans
From the high Andes the threesome flew to Mexico's Yucatan peninsula.
They and forty-five thousand other Mayan aficionados arrived at
Chichén Itzá in time for the summer equinox on March 21st. At the
moment of sunset on the equinox, a shadow is cast by the steps of the
Pyramid of the Castle [photo right and on page one, where the shadow
can be seen] upon the side of the staircase to the top. The shadow
creates the image of a serpent's body which joins a stone carving of a
serpent's head at the bottom of the stair case. It is a stunning
demonstration of Mayan astronomical and architectural precision.
Archeologists, tourists and New Agers all gathered for the event, each
with their own agenda. Since the publication of The Mayan Factor-A
Path Beyond Technology by José Arguëlles, the Mayans and their
advanced calendar, astronomy, philosophy and architecture have
enjoyed a wide following in the West. Sthapati too has found much of
interest in Arguëlles' book.
Standard academia archeologists consider the New Age interest as
bordering on superstition and refuse to even talk to anyone partial to
Mayan mysticism. A recent book, Copan and Tikal, the Secrets of Two
Cities, by Honduran author Ricardo Agurcia Fasquelle and
archaeologist Juan Antonio Valdes of Guatemala, claim that the Mayan
pyramids were actually castles for the wealthy and that what were once
thought to be monuments to the Gods were in fact tributes to the
dynasties of various kings. Not likely.
Native Mayan teachers such as Hunbatz Men, whom Sthapati met while
in the Yucatan, are taking advantage of the interest to spark a revival of
the original Mayan religion among the Mayans themselves. Since their
brutal conquest and forced conversion to Catholicism by the Spaniards
in the 16th century, Mayans have lived an oppressed and impoverished
existence.
Amidst the crowds, Sthapati, Deva and Thamby again unsheathed their
tape measures and closely examined the Pyramid of the Castle [see
diagram right]. It too conformed to the Vastu Vedic principles of
Mayan. The temple structure at the top was exactly 1/4th of the base.
And the stepped pyramid design derived from a three-dimensional
extension of the basic eight-by-eight grid system. The temple room at
the top was also modular in design, with the wall thickness determining
the size of doorways, location of columns, thickness of columns and the
width and length of the structure.
Most interesting was the name of this structure-chilambalam, meaning a
sacred space. It is Sthapati's theory that the Mayans worshiped the very
concept of space, specifically a space made according to the modular
system. This same idea is found in Hinduism in the sacred room in the
center of the Chidambaram Siva Temple in South India, where space or
akasha is worshiped-there is no idol. Chidambaram, Sthapati finds
suspiciously like chilambalam, means "hall of consciousness." The
concept of sacred space is at the center of the mystical shilpi tradition of
India [see sidebar page 14].
The richly decorated Mayan buildings provided a feast for a sculptor's
eye. There is a very common feature called a "mask" by the
archeologists, but known to the Mayans as "Big Nose." A nearly
identical face is a common feature of Hindu iconography, seen, for
example, at the top of the arch placed behind a deity. "It is the very
same thing in India," chuckled Sthapati, "we call it `Maha Nyasa'-Big
Nose!" Several other details of the sculptures were similar or identical to
India, such as the earrings, ear plugs, teeth, head dresses, even buckles
around the waist. There are bas reliefs of priests sitting in lotus posture
meditating.
From Chichén Itzá, they traveled on to Uxmal where they observed the
snake and "bindu" designs on the wall faces [picture right]. They were
astounded by the thousands of pyramids at Tikal and Uxacturn in
Guatemala, all laid out to conform to a grid pattern and oriented in
astronomically significant directions.
As in Mayan buildings, Indians have been using lime mortar for all of
their stone and brick buildings. This can been seen in the monumental
creations in Mahabalipuram and also in the stone temples of Tanjor and
Gangai Konda Choleasuram in Tamil Nadu. The outer surfaces were
plastered, embellishments worked out in lime mortar, then painted. This
method was strongest among the Mayas at Tikal and Uaxactún, where
all of the structures once had a plaster coating painted with many colors.
What is the Connection?
Sri Ganapati Sthapati postulates, after deep thought from his journey to
the land of the Mayans and a lifetime study of South Indian architecture,
that Mayan, the divine architect of Indian tradition, came from Central
America. Ancient Tamil literature speaks of lands to the south of India
30,000 years ago, at the time of the first Tamil Sangam. According to
scientists 160 million years ago India did lie physically close to Africa,
South and Central America, but has since moved away as a result of
continental drift. At that date, it would have been dinosaurs and not
Mayans who wandered from the Americas to India, but perhaps the
time frame for the continental drift is not correct. Architecture aside,
there are significant similarities between Hinduism and the native religions
of both Africa and the Americas.
There are other explanations. The simplest is boats. In 1970 the
Norwegian Thor Hyerdal sailed a reed boat from Africa to the Americas
in 57 days using no modern equipment. The boat, Ra II, was built for
him by the Aymaro Indians of Lake Titicaca, Peru, neighbors of the
ancient Incans. The double-hulled catamarans of India are also capable
of long sea voyages. Historians discount contact between ancient
people, but many cultures, such as the ancient Hawaiians, had
remarkable sea-faring skills.
Perhaps the coincidences of stone working are just that, coincidence -a
favorite "explanation" of archeologists. Stone workers will discover the
same techniques naturally, without need for outside help, they say, and
can point to historical incidents of simultaneous discovery. But this
explanation hardly accounts for the similarities in motifs and modular
design.
Another explanation is mystical-that Mayan, who is a divine being in
Indian histories, appeared to both peoples. He could have conveyed the
knowledge through visions and dreams.
Sri Ganapati Sthapati is vigorously continuing his research and is open to
suggestions from Hinduism Today readers. Any information you may
have on the similarities of the two cultures may be shared with him by
writing to:
Vastu Vedic Research Foundation, Plot A-1, H.I.G. Colony, 1st Main
Road (New Beach Road), Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Thiruvanmiyur, Madras
600 041, India.
The Vastu Vedic Tradition
V. Ganapati Sthapati spoke eloquently during our interviews of the deep
mysticism of his tradition. Here is an excerpt from his paper, "Synthesis
of Science and Spirituality in the Vastu Vedic Tradition of Art and
Architecture."
The Vastu Shilpa tradition of Indian origin has made a scientific
approach to the problems of spirit and spiritual realization. This scientific
tradition of Va-stu perceives Shakti [energy] as all-pervasive and as the
casual substance for all the manifestations of visual and aural phenomena
in the universe. They have named their Shakti as Paravastu in Sanskrit
and the universal objects as Vastu. The word Paravastu means the
quintessence or the ultimate substance. This phenomenon of Vastu and
Va-stu can be equated to gold turned into gold ornaments, the shilpi
acting as the agent for the transformation. Further, this Vastu is
recognized by the Vastu tradition as one dwelling in the inner space of
individual beings as well as in the outside space, the universal being. The
science says that it is space, because of its self-propelled vibration, that
turns into forms-the vibration force acting as the working agency. To do
this is its unquestionable nature. This agency is designated as Absolute
Time, emerging out of space. This is analogous to the vibration of the
instrument of the vina developing into sound space. Here, sound space
turns into sound form, and this when set to rhythmic vibration turns into
musical form.
There is also another space responsible for the sound space. It is called
luminous space. This pervades the entire universe (cosmos). This is the
ultimate space wherein lie the Absolute Time and Absolute Energy. This
is filled with luminous substance (Vastu) consisting of Paramanus, the
minute particles of space. This luminous space is supersensitive, capable
of becoming conscious of itself and vibrating into objects that it becomes
conscious of. This action is its intrinsic nature and responsible for the
forms that occur in the inner space of individuals as well as in the outer
space of the universe. The experience of this form, in terms of space, is
Spiritual Vision. This phenomenon is nothing but abstract science held
by the Vastu tradition.
The Vastu tradition designates the inner being as Shilpi and the inner
manifest subtle form as Shilpa, and as such the whole inner and outer
universes are filled with shilpas. The gross visual forms are projected
outside from the inside, by the inner being. This is the transformation of
the subtle inner form into the gross visual, through the fingers exactly in
tune with the subtle in terms of time and space. That "the sculptor
becomes the sculpture and the poet becomes the poem" is therefore a
powerful Vaignanic statement of the Vastu Vedins, and it is of pure
advaitic tone. The projected visual form has the touch of a lyric,
depending upon the individual inner culture.
The Linguistic Similarities
Chacla in Mayan refers to force centers of the body similar to the
chakras of Hinduism. K'ultanlilni in Mayan refers to the power of God
within man which is controlled by the breath, similar in meaning to
kundalini. Mayan chilambalam refers to a sacred space, as does Tamil
Chidambaram. Yok'hah in Mayan means "on top of truth," similar to
yoga in Sanskrit.
(Two pages of photos in the printed edition show the design, technical
and symbolic similarities. You'll have to subscribe to see it all.)
|